We're kind of assholes, in case you didn't already know. Submit some shit!


Text

Jan 26, 2011
@ 12:51 pm
Permalink
342 notes

Judging Amateurs

Photojournalists judge amateurs. We judge you ALL.

Especially today, when you amateurs can pick up a DSLR and try to pretend you are a professional. You throw up a cookie cutter template blog and make a nice logo that says “So & So photography!” You do free “shoots” for friends. You take low-grade photos at parties and put up a album that says “Party Shoot II” You changed your facebook picture to a photo that shows of half your face, the other half is blocked by the still-in-pristine-condition camera (that real photojournalists can’t afford because we do this for a fucking living and make 10% of what you do) which you used once before you took that photo just to post on your facebook profile to announce to the world “look! I have a camera! I’m a photographer!”

Not sure if this is you yet? Let me go on. You bought $4550 in equipment and no clue how to use it. Most likely a $4500 body, with a $50 lens. You shoot RAW without any clue of why you’re doing it or how to process it. You take 300 horrible ‘engagement photos’ where the couple looks staged, awkward, bored. You watermark them all. THEM ALL. You put more time into getting the damn watermark perfect on each of your mediocre shots than actually taking a good photo. You post all 300 mistakes on facebook or your ‘photography’ blog.

Then, oh god, then you ask our opinion. We nod our heads, we smile, we may even say “not bad” or “that one’s nice!” to make you shut up and leave us alone. In reality, we are screaming, pulling out our hair, crying for it to stop because it hurts. We are dissecting your shots, sighing at your straightforward angles, predictable environments and boring lighting.

By the way, we are also annoyed that you charged $25 an hour to take these bad photos that you are now forcing us to look through like a never-ending slideshow from hell. Why? Because people come to us expecting brilliant photos (way better than yours because after all, WE are the professionals) at the same damn price you charge because its your “hobby.” Well screw you. We don’t walk into offices to type up financial documents or pull teeth as our ‘hobby’ charging $10 bucks a pop, so stay the hell away from our livelihood. Not only do you take bad photos, but you make us look at them while you are bringing down our industry and asking for our approval.

So yea, we can’t help it. We judge you, because you suck.

  1. pret-a-taux-zero1 reblogged this from shitphotojournalistslike
  2. pret-personnel reblogged this from shitphotojournalistslike
  3. credit-autos reblogged this from shitphotojournalistslike
  4. zeolite-powder reblogged this from shitphotojournalistslike
  5. tens-unit-reviews reblogged this from shitphotojournalistslike
  6. robert-betz reblogged this from shitphotojournalistslike
  7. linhnguyenx reblogged this from shitphotojournalistslike
  8. rachelaust reblogged this from shitphotojournalistslike
  9. nicheey reblogged this from shitphotojournalistslike
  10. througheco reblogged this from shitphotojournalistslike
  11. conjuntof reblogged this from shitphotojournalistslike
  12. rahmahpauzi reblogged this from shitphotojournalistslike
  13. snapjax reblogged this from shitphotojournalistslike
  14. airzona reblogged this from shitphotojournalistslike
  15. chasead reblogged this from shitphotojournalistslike
  16. jawajambalaya reblogged this from shitphotojournalistslike
  17. chelsea-mcpherson-photography reblogged this from shitphotojournalistslike
  18. driftingfocus reblogged this from shitphotojournalistslike and added:
    Yep. It’s true.